Kaye v. Co-Ordinating Comm. on Discipline of Assn. of Bar of City of New York

Supreme Court

Kaye v. Co-Ordinating Comm. on Discipline of Assn. of Bar of City of New York

386 U.S. 17, 87 S. Ct. 848, 17 L. Ed. 2d 698, 1967 U.S. LEXIS 2275

Supreme Court of the United States·Decided February 13, 1967·No. 300·Published·Cited by 11 cases

Opinions

Per Curiam.

The petition for a writ of certiorari is granted. The judgment is vacated and the case is remanded to the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Judicial Department, for reconsideration in light of Spevack v. Klein, 385 U. S. 511.

Mr. Justice Clark, Mr. Justice Harlan, and Mr. Justice Stewart would affirm the judgment below for the reasons stated in the dissenting opinions of Mr. Justice Harlan in Spevack v. Klein, 385 U. S., at 520, and Garrity v. New Jersey, 385 U. S. 493, 500.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam.

The petition for a writ of certiorari is granted. The judgment is vacated and the case is remanded to the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Judicial Department, for reconsideration in light of Spevack v. Klein, 385 U. S. 511.

Mr. Justice Clark, Mr. Justice Harlan, and Mr. Justice Stewart would affirm the judgment below for the reasons stated in the dissenting opinions of Mr. Justice Harlan in Spevack v. Klein, 385 U. S., at 520, and Garrity v. New Jersey, 385 U. S. 493, 500.

Kaye v. Co-Ordinating Comm. on Discipline of Assn. of Bar of City of New York, 386 U.S. 17, 87 S. Ct. 848, 17 L. Ed. 2d 698, 1967 U.S. LEXIS 2275 (1967).

Pincite

386 U.S. 17 (Kaye v. Co-Ordinating Comm. on Discipline of Assn. of Bar of City of New York) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinions

Related