Kauffeld v. G. F. Pfund & Sons

116 A. 487, 97 N.J.L. 335, 1922 N.J. LEXIS 204
CourtSupreme Court of New Jersey
DecidedMarch 6, 1922
StatusPublished
Cited by11 cases

This text of 116 A. 487 (Kauffeld v. G. F. Pfund & Sons) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of New Jersey primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Kauffeld v. G. F. Pfund & Sons, 116 A. 487, 97 N.J.L. 335, 1922 N.J. LEXIS 204 (N.J. 1922).

Opinion

Per Curiam.

The judgment under review' herein should be affirmed, for the reasons expressed in the opinion of the Supreme Court; except that the Supreme Court made an error In holding that the deceased’s employment necessitated his entering the defendant’s smoke-house. The Court of Common Pleas, whose decision the Supreme Court reviewed, held that he did not enter the smoke-house. And the rule is that the Supreme Court may not review the facts as found by the Common Pleas in these eases when there is any evidence to support the lower court’s findings; and there was in this case.

On the whole case there was sufficient evidence to warrant the judgments arrived at both in the Co¡mmon Pleas and [337]*337in the Supreme Court; and the judgment here under review will therefore be affirmed.

For (affirmance — Tiie Chancellor, Cm he Justice, Trench Attn, Bergen, Mlnturn, Kaltscii, Kateenbach, White, IIeppenh'eiaier, Willlams, Gardner, Acjecerson, Van Bijskirií, JJ. 13.

For reversal — None.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Neylon v. Ford Motor Company
86 A.2d 577 (Supreme Court of New Jersey, 1952)
Ciocca v. National Sugar Refining Co. of N.J.
12 A.2d 130 (Supreme Court of New Jersey, 1940)
Ballinger v. Wagaraw Building Supply Co.
200 A. 744 (Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, 1938)
Alexander Orr, Jr., Inc. v. Florida Industrial Comm.
176 So. 172 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1937)
Richter v. E. I. Du Pont De Nemours & Co.
193 A. 194 (Supreme Court of New Jersey, 1937)
Azarowicz v. Metropolitan Beef Co.
191 A. 483 (Supreme Court of New Jersey, 1937)
Rubeo v. Arthur McMullen Co.
189 A. 662 (Supreme Court of New Jersey, 1937)
Pikus v. American Fur Dyeing Co.
180 A. 494 (New Jersey Department of Labor Workmen's Compensation Bureau, 1935)
Essbee Amusement Corp. v. Greenhaus
177 A. 562 (Supreme Court of New Jersey, 1935)
Fogg v. Van Saun Coal Co.
174 A. 419 (New Jersey Department of Labor Workmen's Compensation Bureau, 1934)
Higham v. Preakness Hills Country Club
10 N.J. Misc. 889 (New Jersey Department of Labor Workmen's Compensation Bureau, 1932)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
116 A. 487, 97 N.J.L. 335, 1922 N.J. LEXIS 204, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/kauffeld-v-g-f-pfund-sons-nj-1922.