Katzenbach v. McClellan

Fifth Circuit

Katzenbach v. McClellan

341 F.2d 922

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit

DecidedMarch 8, 1965

DocketNo. 21219

StatusPublished

This text of 341 F.2d 922 (Katzenbach v. McClellan) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Katzenbach v. McClellan, 341 F.2d 922 (5th Cir. 1965).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

No new questions are presented by these consolidated appeals. The issues have been decided against the contentions made by the appellees. See State of Alabama ex rel. Gallion v. Rogers, M. D. Ala., 1960, 187 F.Supp. 848, affirmed sub nom. Dinkens v. Attorney General, 5th Cir. 1961, 285 F.2d 430, cert. denied, Dinkens v. Rogers, 366 U.S. 913, 81 S.Ct. 1085, 6 L.Ed.2d 236; Kennedy v. Lynd, 5th Cir. 1962, 306 F.2d 222, cert. denied, 371 U.S. 952, 83 S.Ct. 507, 9 L.Ed.2d 500; Coleman v. Kennedy, 5th Cir. 1963, 313 F.2d 867, cert. denied, 373 U.S. 950, 83 S.Ct. 1681, 10 L.Ed.2d 705; Kennedy v. Owen, 5th Cir. 1963, 321 F.2d 116; and Kennedy v. Lewis, 5th Cir. 1963, 325 F.2d 210, cert. denied, 377 U.S. 932, 84 S.Ct. 1334, 12 L.Ed.2d 295.

. It follows that the judgments must be reversed and remanded to the district court of the Southern District of Mississippi so that the applications of the Attorney General may be granted and an appropriate order may be entered as was directed in Kennedy v. Owen, supra.

The cross appeals will be dismissed. Judgment reversed and remanded, cross appeal dismissed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM:

No new questions are presented by these consolidated appeals. The issues have been decided against the contentions made by the appellees. See State of Alabama ex rel. Gallion v. Rogers, M. D. Ala., 1960, 187 F.Supp. 848, affirmed sub nom. Dinkens v. Attorney General, 5th Cir. 1961, 285 F.2d 430, cert. denied, Dinkens v. Rogers, 366 U.S. 913, 81 S.Ct. 1085, 6 L.Ed.2d 236; Kennedy v. Lynd, 5th Cir. 1962, 306 F.2d 222, cert. denied, 371 U.S. 952, 83 S.Ct. 507, 9 L.Ed.2d 500; Coleman v. Kennedy, 5th Cir. 1963, 313 F.2d 867, cert. denied, 373 U.S. 950, 83 S.Ct. 1681, 10 L.Ed.2d 705; Kennedy v. Owen, 5th Cir. 1963, 321 F.2d 116; and Kennedy v. Lewis, 5th Cir. 1963, 325 F.2d 210, cert. denied, 377 U.S. 932, 84 S.Ct. 1334, 12 L.Ed.2d 295.

. It follows that the judgments must be reversed and remanded to the district court of the Southern District of Mississippi so that the applications of the Attorney General may be granted and an appropriate order may be entered as was directed in Kennedy v. Owen, supra.

The cross appeals will be dismissed. Judgment reversed and remanded, cross appeal dismissed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

341 F.2d 922, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/katzenbach-v-mcclellan-ca5-1965.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack