Dinkins v. Rogers
366 U.S. 913, 81 S. Ct. 1085
CourtSupreme Court of the United States
DecidedMay 1, 1961
DocketNo. 823; No. 824
StatusPublished
Cited by2 cases
This text of 366 U.S. 913 (Dinkins v. Rogers) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of the United States primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Dinkins v. Rogers, 366 U.S. 913, 81 S. Ct. 1085 (1961).
Opinion
Motions to substitute Robert F. Kennedy in the place of William P. Rogers as party respondent granted. Petitions for writs of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit denied.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Nicholas De B. Katzenbach, Attorney General of the United States v. Henry B. McClellan Circuit Court Clerk and Registrar of Holmes County, Mississippi, Henry B. McClellan Circuit Court Clerk and Registrar of Holmes County, Mississippi v. Nicholas De B. Katzenbach, Attorney General of the United States
341 F.2d 922 (Fifth Circuit, 1965)
Katzenbach v. McClellan
341 F.2d 922 (Fifth Circuit, 1965)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
366 U.S. 913, 81 S. Ct. 1085, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/dinkins-v-rogers-scotus-1961.