Kates v. Universal Underwriters Insurance Co.

Missouri Court of Appeals

Kates v. Universal Underwriters Insurance Co.

348 S.W.3d 115, 2011 Mo. App. LEXIS 1175, 2011 WL 4025524

Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided September 13, 2011·No. WD 72803·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM:

Universal Underwriters Insurance Company (“Universal”) appeals from a judgment entered in the Circuit Court of Jackson County awarding John and Barbara Kates $322,652.00 in an equitable garnishment action they had filed against Universal. After a thorough review of the record, we conclude that the judgment is supported by substantial evidence, is not against the weight of the evidence, and that no error of law appears. No jurisprudential purpose would be served by a formal, published opinion; however, a memorandum explaining the reasons for *116 our decision has been provided to the parties.

Judgment affirmed. Rule 84.16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM:

Universal Underwriters Insurance Company (“Universal”) appeals from a judgment entered in the Circuit Court of Jackson County awarding John and Barbara Kates $322,652.00 in an equitable garnishment action they had filed against Universal. After a thorough review of the record, we conclude that the judgment is supported by substantial evidence, is not against the weight of the evidence, and that no error of law appears. No jurisprudential purpose would be served by a formal, published opinion; however, a memorandum explaining the reasons for *116 our decision has been provided to the parties.

Judgment affirmed. Rule 84.16(b).

Kates v. Universal Underwriters Insurance Co., 348 S.W.3d 115, 2011 Mo. App. LEXIS 1175, 2011 WL 4025524 (Mo. Ct. App. 2011).

Pincite

348 S.W.3d 115 (Kates v. Universal Underwriters Insurance Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related