Karr v. Dowsett

Michigan Court of Appeals

Karr v. Dowsett

162 N.W.2d 118, 11 Mich. App. 653, 1968 Mich. App. LEXIS 1356

CourtMichigan Court of Appeals

DecidedJune 10, 1968

DocketDocket No. 4,327

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 162 N.W.2d 118 (Karr v. Dowsett) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Michigan Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Karr v. Dowsett, 162 N.W.2d 118, 11 Mich. App. 653, 1968 Mich. App. LEXIS 1356 (Mich. Ct. App. 1968).

Pincite

Opinion

Per Curiam.

Defendants appeal from a judgment for plaintiffs in this action of ejectment. A review of the record does not indicate the findings of the [654]*654trial court on which the judgment was based are clearly erroneous. GrCR, 1963, 517.1 See, also, Schneider v. Pomerville (1957), 348 Mich 49; Northwest Auto Company v. Mulligan Lincoln-Mercury, Inc. (1957), 348 Mich 279; Barnes v. Beck (1957), 348 Mich 286.

Affirmed, with costs to plaintiffs.

Quinn, P. J., and Fitzgerald and J. H. Gillis, JJ., concurred.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam.

Defendants appeal from a judgment for plaintiffs in this action of ejectment. A review of the record does not indicate the findings of the [654]*654trial court on which the judgment was based are clearly erroneous. GrCR, 1963, 517.1 See, also, Schneider v. Pomerville (1957), 348 Mich 49; Northwest Auto Company v. Mulligan Lincoln-Mercury, Inc. (1957), 348 Mich 279; Barnes v. Beck (1957), 348 Mich 286.

Affirmed, with costs to plaintiffs.

Quinn, P. J., and Fitzgerald and J. H. Gillis, JJ., concurred.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

162 N.W.2d 118, 11 Mich. App. 653, 1968 Mich. App. LEXIS 1356, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/karr-v-dowsett-michctapp-1968.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack