Karr v. Borchardt

Ohio Supreme Court

Karr v. Borchardt

728 N.E.2d 362, 88 Ohio St. 3d 535

Ohio Supreme Court·Decided May 24, 2000·No. Nos. 99-219, 99-222, 99-223 and 99-224·Published·Cited by 6 cases

Opinions

The judgment of the court of appeals is vacated, and the cause is remanded to the trial court for further proceedings and consideration, where applicable, of the Supreme Court’s decisions in Wolfe v. Wolfe (2000), 88 Ohio St.3d 246, 725 N.E.2d 261, and Moore v. State Auto. Mut. Ins. Co. (2000), 88 Ohio St.3d 27, 723 N.E.2d 97.

Douglas, Resnick, F.E. Sweeney and Pfeifer, JJ., concur. Douglas, J., concurs separately. Moyer, C.J., Cook and Lundberg Stratton, JJ., dissent.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

The judgment of the court of appeals is vacated, and the cause is remanded to the trial court for further proceedings and consideration, where applicable, of the Supreme Court’s decisions in Wolfe v. Wolfe (2000), 88 Ohio St.3d 246, 725 N.E.2d 261, and Moore v. State Auto. Mut. Ins. Co. (2000), 88 Ohio St.3d 27, 723 N.E.2d 97.

Douglas, Resnick, F.E. Sweeney and Pfeifer, JJ., concur. Douglas, J., concurs separately. Moyer, C.J., Cook and Lundberg Stratton, JJ., dissent.

Karr v. Borchardt, 728 N.E.2d 362, 88 Ohio St. 3d 535 (Ohio 2000).

Pincite

728 N.E.2d 362 (Karr v. Borchardt) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinions

Related