Karl Storz Imaging, Inc. v. Pointe Conception Medical, Inc.

471 F. App'x 904
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
DecidedJuly 16, 2012
Docket2012-1001
StatusUnpublished

This text of 471 F. App'x 904 (Karl Storz Imaging, Inc. v. Pointe Conception Medical, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Karl Storz Imaging, Inc. v. Pointe Conception Medical, Inc., 471 F. App'x 904 (Fed. Cir. 2012).

Opinion

NEWMAN, Circuit Judge.

ORDER

The parties jointly move to remand this case to the United States District Court for the Central District of California due to settlement.

The parties state they have settled the case and requested an indicative ruling indicating from the district court, pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 62.1, whether the district court would defer, deny, or grant a motion to vacate the underlying judgment if the case were remanded. The district court indicated pursuant to Rule 62.1(a)(3) that it would grant the motion.

Upon consideration thereof,

It Is Ordered That:

(1) The motion to remand is granted. This court, however, takes no position on the propriety or necessity of vacator, leaving it to the district court to apply the principles enunciated in U.S. Bancorp Mortgage Co. v. Bonner Mall Partnership, 513 U.S. 18, 29, 115 S.Ct. 386, 130 L.Ed.2d 233 (1994).

(2) Each side shall bear its own costs.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
471 F. App'x 904, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/karl-storz-imaging-inc-v-pointe-conception-medical-inc-cafc-2012.