Karl Schroff & Assoc., Inc. v. United States

62 Cust. Ct. 1082
United States Customs Court·Decided April 22, 1969·No. No. P69/111; protests 67/60486-5044, etc. (Chicago)·Published

Opinion

Watson, J.

In accordance with submission on agreed statement of facts that the merchandise covered by the foregoing protests consists of artificial flowers, trees, foliage, fruits, vegetables, grasses, or grains, and articles made therefrom, in chief value of plastic, assembled in the same manner as the merchandise the subject of Armbee Corporation et al. v. United States (60 Cust. Ct. 105, C.D. 3278) and Zunold Trading Corporation et al. v. United States (60 Cust. Ct. 112, C.D. 3279), the claim of the plaintiff was sustained.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Karl Schroff & Assoc., Inc. v. United States, 62 Cust. Ct. 1082 (cusc 1969).

62 Cust. Ct. 1082 (Karl Schroff & Assoc., Inc. v. United States) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Armbee Corp. v. United States
60 Cust. Ct. 105 (U.S. Customs Court, 1968)
Zunold Trading Corp. v. United States
60 Cust. Ct. 112 (U.S. Customs Court, 1968)