Karl Schroff & Assoc., Inc. v. United States
This text of 62 Cust. Ct. 145 (Karl Schroff & Assoc., Inc. v. United States) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering United States Customs Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
These protests enumerated in schedule “A”, hereto attached and made a part hereof, have been submitted for decision on a written stipulation, reading as follows:
IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED AND AGREED by and between counsel for the plaintiff and the Assistant Attorney General for the United States as follows:
1. That the articles marked “A” and initialed JW (Commodity Specialist’s Initials) by Commodity Specialist John Walsh (Commodity Specialist’s Name) on the invoices covered by the protests enumerated on Schedule “A” attached hereto and made a part hereof were assessed with duty at the rate of 35% ad valorem under Item 737.90, TSUS, as parts of toys not specially provided for, and are claimed to be dutiable at 11.5% ad valorem under Item 734.20, TSUS, as parts of game machines having mechanical controls for manipulating the action.
2. That the device of which said articles are parts is a substantially constructed road race game consisting of cars operated on track, in the operation of which each player controls the speed of the cars by mechanical controls to conform to the conditions of the track so as to be first at the finish line.
3. That plaintiff claims that said device is the type of article described in Item 734.20, and excepted from the provisions of Item 737.90 by virtue of Headnote 1 (iii), Subpart E, Part 5, Schedule 7.
IT IS FURTHER STIPULATED AND AGREED that said protests be submitted on this stipulation, the protests being limited to the articles marked “A” as aforesaid.
This stipulated statement of the facts is sufficient to remove the present merchandise from the classification determined by the defendant and to establish the proper classification, as claimed by the plaintiffs, to be under item 734.20 of the Tariff Schedules of the United States at 11.5 percent ad valorem as parts of game machines.
To the extent indicated the protests are sustained and judgment will be rendered accordingly.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
62 Cust. Ct. 145, 1969 Cust. Ct. LEXIS 3632, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/karl-schroff-assoc-inc-v-united-states-cusc-1969.