Karasek v. Hallenbeck

203 A.D.2d 921, 612 N.Y.S.2d 991
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided April 15, 1994·No. Appeal No. 1·Published

Opinion

—Judgment unanimously reversed on the law without costs and judgment granted in accordance with the following Memorandum: Supreme Court erred in granting petitioners’ motion for summary judgment and in declaring that respondents had no authority under section 32-a of the Town Law to enter petitioners’ land. A plain reading of that section permits the action taken, as well as the action proposed to be taken, by the town engineer. Thus, we grant judgment in favor of respondents and declare that respondents have authority under section 32-a of the Town Law to enter petitioners’ land without petitioners’ permission to make studies, [922]*922investigations, tests or to enter for any other purpose related to the proposed county landfill project. (Appeal from Judgment of Supreme Court, Onondaga County, Hurlbutt, J.— Declaratory Judgment.) Present — Green, J. P., Balio, Fallon, Callahan and Boehm, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Karasek v. Hallenbeck, 203 A.D.2d 921, 612 N.Y.S.2d 991 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1994).

203 A.D.2d 921 (Karasek v. Hallenbeck) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.