Home/Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York/Karasek v. Hallenbeck

Karasek v. Hallenbeck

185 A.D.2d 719, 596 N.Y.S.2d 739, 1992 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 15191
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedJuly 14, 1992
StatusPublished

This text of 185 A.D.2d 719 (Karasek v. Hallenbeck) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Karasek v. Hallenbeck, 185 A.D.2d 719, 596 N.Y.S.2d 739, 1992 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 15191 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1992).

Opinion

Motion to vacate statutory stay or for other relief denied. Memorandum: Petitioners’ motion pursuant to CPLR 5519 (c) is unnecessary. The taking of the appeal did not automatically vacate the temporary restraining order and the same remains in effect (see, Crane v New York Council 66, 101 AD2d 682). Present — Callahan, J. P., Boomer, Green, Lawton and Davis, JJ. (Entered June 26, 1992.)

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Crane v. New York Council 66 of American Federation of State Employees
101 A.D.2d 682 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1984)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
185 A.D.2d 719, 596 N.Y.S.2d 739, 1992 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 15191, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/karasek-v-hallenbeck-nyappdiv-1992.