Home/Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York/Karasek v. Hallenbeck

Karasek v. Hallenbeck

185 A.D.2d 719, 596 N.Y.S.2d 739, 1992 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 15191
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided July 14, 1992·Published

Opinion

Motion to vacate statutory stay or for other relief denied. Memorandum: Petitioners’ motion pursuant to CPLR 5519 (c) is unnecessary. The taking of the appeal did not automatically vacate the temporary restraining order and the same remains in effect (see, Crane v New York Council 66, 101 AD2d 682). Present — Callahan, J. P., Boomer, Green, Lawton and Davis, JJ. (Entered June 26, 1992.)

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Karasek v. Hallenbeck, 185 A.D.2d 719, 596 N.Y.S.2d 739, 1992 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 15191 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1992).

185 A.D.2d 719 (Karasek v. Hallenbeck) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Crane v. New York Council 66 of American Federation of State Employees
101 A.D.2d 682 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1984)