Karas v. Shur

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Karas v. Shur

189 A.D.2d 856

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided January 25, 1993·Published·Cited by 3 cases

Opinion

In consolidated actions, inter alia, to set aside a mortgage, the plaintiffs Zipora Karas and Deborah Karas Ben Ezra, individually and doing business as 4711 Associates, appeal, as limited by their brief, from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Spodek, J.), dated July 10, 1990, as denied their motion for summary judgment. The plaintiffs were subsequently granted summary judgment by an order of the same court, dated December 20, 1990.

Ordered that the appeal is dismissed as academic, without costs or disbursements (see, Karas v Shur, 189 AD2d 856 [decided herewith]). Mangano, P. J., Rosenblatt, Ritter and Santucci, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In consolidated actions, inter alia, to set aside a mortgage, the plaintiffs Zipora Karas and Deborah Karas Ben Ezra, individually and doing business as 4711 Associates, appeal, as limited by their brief, from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Spodek, J.), dated July 10, 1990, as denied their motion for summary judgment. The plaintiffs were subsequently granted summary judgment by an order of the same court, dated December 20, 1990.

Ordered that the appeal is dismissed as academic, without costs or disbursements (see, Karas v Shur, 189 AD2d 856 [decided herewith]). Mangano, P. J., Rosenblatt, Ritter and Santucci, JJ., concur.

Karas v. Shur, 189 A.D.2d 856 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1993).

Pincite

189 A.D.2d 856 (Karas v. Shur) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related