Kapple v. N.D. Dep't of Transportation

2016 ND 86
CourtNorth Dakota Supreme Court
DecidedMay 26, 2016
Docket20160029
StatusPublished

This text of 2016 ND 86 (Kapple v. N.D. Dep't of Transportation) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering North Dakota Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Kapple v. N.D. Dep't of Transportation, 2016 ND 86 (N.D. 2016).

Opinion

Filed 5/26/16 by Clerk of Supreme Court

IN THE SUPREME COURT

STATE OF NORTH DAKOTA

2016 ND 86

Justin James Kapple, Petitioner and Appellee

v.

Director, North Dakota Department

of Transportation, Respondent and Appellant

No. 20160029

Appeal from the District Court of Burleigh County, South Central Judicial District, the Honorable Bruce B. Haskell, Judge.

REVERSED.

Per Curiam.

Michael R. Hoffman, P.O. Box 1056, Bismarck, ND 58502-1056, for petitioner and appellee.

Michael T. Pitcher, Assistant Attorney General, Office of the Attorney General, 500 N. Ninth St., Bismarck, ND 58501-4509, for respondent and appellant.

Kapple v. N.D. Dept. of Transp.

[¶1] The North Dakota Department of Transportation appealed from a district court’s judgment reversing an administrative hearing officer’s decision revoking Justin Kappel’s driving privileges for three years for refusal to submit to chemical testing.  

[¶2] The administrative hearing officer determined law enforcement had reasonable grounds to believe Kapple had been driving while under the influence of alcohol and Kapple refused to submit to a chemical test.  Kapple appealed the hearing officer’s decision, arguing the report and notice form did not indicate a reasonable suspicion to lawfully detain him.  The district court reversed, concluding the report and notice form did not articulate a reasonable suspicion that Kapple was under the influence of alcohol prior to being detained.  The Department appealed, arguing the report and notice form complied with the requirements of N.D.C.C. § 39-20-04(1).  We agree, concluding Olson v. Levi , 2015 ND 250, 870 N.W.2d 222, is dispositive of this appeal.  In Olson , we stated law enforcement does not need reasonable suspicion to approach an already stopped vehicle.   Id. at ¶ 9.  We summarily reverse under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(b) and reinstate the hearing officer’s decision.

[¶3] Gerald W. VandeWalle, C.J.

Lisa Fair McEvers

Daniel J. Crothers

Dale V. Sandstrom

Carol Ronning Kapsner

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Olson v. Levi
2015 ND 250 (North Dakota Supreme Court, 2015)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
2016 ND 86, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/kapple-v-nd-dept-of-transportation-nd-2016.