Kaplan v. Katz

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Kaplan v. Katz

254 A.D. 880, 5 N.Y.S.2d 8, 1938 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 8138

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedJune 10, 1938

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 254 A.D. 880 (Kaplan v. Katz) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Kaplan v. Katz, 254 A.D. 880, 5 N.Y.S.2d 8, 1938 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 8138 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1938).

Pincite

Opinion

Plaintiff, a paying guest at a summer camp owned and operated by defendants, tripped on the floor of the porch of one of the camp’s bungalows and fell down a flight of steps, receiving injuries. She brought this action and received a verdict for $3,000. On motion, the trial court set the verdict aside on the ground that it is “ entirely against the weight of evidence.” Plaintiff appeals from the order and from the resettled order. Besettled order unanimously affirmed, with costs. No opinion. The original order having been superseded by the resettled order, the appeal from it is dismissed. The case will be restored to the trial calendar on five days’ notice. Present — Lazansky, P. J., Carswell, Davis, Adel and Close, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Plaintiff, a paying guest at a summer camp owned and operated by defendants, tripped on the floor of the porch of one of the camp’s bungalows and fell down a flight of steps, receiving injuries. She brought this action and received a verdict for $3,000. On motion, the trial court set the verdict aside on the ground that it is “ entirely against the weight of evidence.” Plaintiff appeals from the order and from the resettled order. Besettled order unanimously affirmed, with costs. No opinion. The original order having been superseded by the resettled order, the appeal from it is dismissed. The case will be restored to the trial calendar on five days’ notice. Present — Lazansky, P. J., Carswell, Davis, Adel and Close, JJ.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

254 A.D. 880, 5 N.Y.S.2d 8, 1938 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 8138, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/kaplan-v-katz-nyappdiv-1938.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack