Kaplan v. Epstein
3 A.2d 573, 121 N.J.L. 534, 1939 N.J. LEXIS 260
This text of 3 A.2d 573 (Kaplan v. Epstein) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of New Jersey primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Kaplan v. Epstein, 3 A.2d 573, 121 N.J.L. 534, 1939 N.J. LEXIS 260 (N.J. 1939).
Opinion
The judgment under review herein should be affirmed, for the reasons set forth in the opinion delivered per curiam by the Supreme Court.
For affirmance — -The Chancellor, Chief Justice, Case, Bodine, Donges, Heher, Porter, Hetfield, Dear, Wells, WolfsKeil, Rafferty, Walker, JJ. 13.
For reversal — None.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Edgerton v. Maine Ctr. on Deafness
Maine Superior, 2008
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
3 A.2d 573, 121 N.J.L. 534, 1939 N.J. LEXIS 260, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/kaplan-v-epstein-nj-1939.