Kaplan v. Epstein

3 A.2d 573, 121 N.J.L. 534, 1939 N.J. LEXIS 260

Supreme Court of New Jersey·Decided January 13, 1939·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

Per Curiam.

The judgment under review herein should be affirmed, for the reasons set forth in the opinion delivered per curiam by the Supreme Court.

For affirmance — -The Chancellor, Chief Justice, Case, Bodine, Donges, Heher, Porter, Hetfield, Dear, Wells, WolfsKeil, Rafferty, Walker, JJ. 13.

For reversal — None.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Kaplan v. Epstein, 3 A.2d 573, 121 N.J.L. 534, 1939 N.J. LEXIS 260 (N.J. 1939).

Pincite

3 A.2d 573 (Kaplan v. Epstein) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.