Kapaia Store, Ltd. v. Henriques

33 Haw. 575, 1935 Haw. LEXIS 14
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Kapaia Store, Ltd. v. Henriques. Read the opinion of the Court — 33 Haw. 557
Hawaii Supreme Court·Decided September 19, 1935·No. No. 2218.·Published

Opinion

Per Curiam.

Counsel for appellant has intei'posed a petition for rehearing. The petition is not supported by a certificate of counsel as required by section 5 of the rules of this court, for Avhich reason it should be denied. Hinds v. Keith, 57 Fed. 10. While our rule provides that a petition for a rehearing be accompanied by certificate of counsel, no set form of language is prescribed. The federal rule requires that a petition for rehearing be supported by certificate of counsel to the effect that the petition is presented in good faith and not for delay. 8 Hughes Fed. Prac., § 5641. Such a certificate would, of course, meet the requirements of our rule. In the present case, however, no certificate of merit of any hind accompanies the *576 petition. We will not, however, rest our dismissal of the petition solely upon the failure of counsel to observe the rules of court. The petition is both defective in form and devoid of merit and is therefore denied.

L. A. Dickey for the petition.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Kapaia Store, Ltd. v. Henriques, 33 Haw. 575, 1935 Haw. LEXIS 14 (haw 1935).

33 Haw. 575 (Kapaia Store, Ltd. v. Henriques) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Hinds v. Keith
57 F. 10 (Fifth Circuit, 1893)