Kansas City Public Service Co. v. Ranson

285 U.S. 528, 52 S. Ct. 409, 76 L. Ed. 924, 1932 U.S. LEXIS 468
Supreme Court of the United States·Decided March 28, 1932·No. No. 521·Published·Cited by 6 cases

Opinion

Per Curiam:

The appeal herein is dismissed for the want of a substantial federal question. Glenn v. Doyal, ante, p. 526; Moffitt v. Kelly, 218 U. S. 400, 404, 405; Nickel v. Cole, 256 U. S. 222, 226; Castillo v. McConnico, 168 U. S. 674, 683; Lombard v. West Chicago Park Comm’rs, 181 U. S. 33, 42, 43; Rawlins v. Georgia, 201 U. S. 638, 639, 640; Hebert v. Louisiana, 272 U. S. 312, [529]*529316, 317.

Mr. Powell C. Groner, with whom Messrs. Robert W. Otto and Henry N. Ess were on the brief, for appellant. ' Messrs. Henry L. McCune and E. H. Wright were on the brief for appellee.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Kansas City Public Service Co. v. Ranson, 285 U.S. 528, 52 S. Ct. 409, 76 L. Ed. 924, 1932 U.S. LEXIS 468 (1932).

285 U.S. 528 (Kansas City Public Service Co. v. Ranson) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Seafirst Corp. v. Dept. of Revenue
833 P.2d 725 (Arizona Tax Court, 1992)
New York, Susquehanna & Western Railroad v. Vermeulen
210 A.2d 214 (Supreme Court of New Jersey, 1965)
NY, SUSQUEHANNA AND WRR CO. v. Vermeulen
210 A.2d 214 (Supreme Court of New Jersey, 1965)
State Ex Inf. Kell v. Buchanan
210 S.W.2d 359 (Supreme Court of Missouri, 1948)
In Re Santillanes
138 P.2d 503 (New Mexico Supreme Court, 1943)
Asbury Truck Co. v. Railroad Commission
287 U.S. 570 (Supreme Court, 1932)