Kanecke v. George's Crane Service, Inc.

567 So. 2d 62, 1990 Fla. App. LEXIS 7677, 1990 WL 149781
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided October 9, 1990·No. No. 89-2079·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Based on this court’s review of the record and appellee’s confession of error, we reverse the order of summary final judgment, entered on an erroneous finding of the applicability of the exclusive remedy doctrine. Conklin v. Cohen, 287 So.2d 56 (Fla.1973); Smith v. Ussery, 261 So.2d 164 (Fla.1972); Jones v. Florida Power Corp., 72 So.2d 285 (Fla.1954); Cadillac Fairview of Fla., Inc. v. Cespedes, 468 So.2d 417 (Fla. 3d DCA), review denied, 479 So.2d 117 (Fla.1985); Moreno v. Universal Trusses, Inc., 416 So.2d 1221 (Fla. 3d DCA 1982).

The cause is hereby remanded to the trial court for further proceedings consistent with this opinion.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Kanecke v. George's Crane Service, Inc., 567 So. 2d 62, 1990 Fla. App. LEXIS 7677, 1990 WL 149781 (Fla. Ct. App. 1990).

567 So. 2d 62 (Kanecke v. George's Crane Service, Inc.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Jones v. Florida Power Corp.
72 So. 2d 285 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1954)
Conklin v. Cohen
287 So. 2d 56 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1973)
Smith v. Ussery
261 So. 2d 164 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1972)
Cadillac Fairview of Florida, Inc. v. Cespedes
468 So. 2d 417 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1985)
Moreno v. Universal Trusses, Inc.
416 So. 2d 1221 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1982)