Kane v. Hartz Mountain Industries, Inc.
669 A.2d 816, 143 N.J. 141, 1996 CCH OSHD 31,034, 1996 N.J. LEXIS 3
Opinion
The judgment is affirmed, substantially for the reasons expressed in the opinion of Judge Shebell of the Appellate Division, reported at 278 N.J.Super. 129, 650 A.2d 808 (1994).
For affirmance — Chief Justice WILENTZ, and Justices HANDLER, POLLOCK, O’HERN, GARIBALDI, STEIN and COLEMAN — 7.
Opposed — none.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Kane v. Hartz Mountain Industries, Inc., 669 A.2d 816, 143 N.J. 141, 1996 CCH OSHD 31,034, 1996 N.J. LEXIS 3 (N.J. 1996).
669 A.2d 816 (Kane v. Hartz Mountain Industries, Inc.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Kane v. HARTZ MOUNTAIN INDUSTRIES, INC.
669 A.2d 816 (Supreme Court of New Jersey, 1996)