Kandler v. Suffolk County Division of Real Estate
This text of 296 A.D.2d 568 (Kandler v. Suffolk County Division of Real Estate) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
In an action to compel specific performance of a real estate contract, the plaintiffs appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Suffolk County (Hall, J.), dated February 1, 2001, which granted the defendant’s motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint.
Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs.
Contrary to the plaintiffs’ contention, the purported oral contract for the purchase of the subject real property is unenforceable (see General Obligations Law § 5-703 [1]; Ghura v Islip Resource Recovery Agency, 122 AD2d 106). Accordingly, the Supreme Court properly granted the defendant’s motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint.
The plaintiffs’ remaining contentions are either unpreserved for appellate review or without merit. O’Brien, J.P., Krausman, Schmidt and Cozier, JJ., concur.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
296 A.D.2d 568, 745 N.Y.S.2d 713, 2002 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 7735, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/kandler-v-suffolk-county-division-of-real-estate-nyappdiv-2002.