Kandler v. Suffolk County Division of Real Estate

296 A.D.2d 568, 745 N.Y.S.2d 713, 2002 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 7735

This text of 296 A.D.2d 568 (Kandler v. Suffolk County Division of Real Estate) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Kandler v. Suffolk County Division of Real Estate, 296 A.D.2d 568, 745 N.Y.S.2d 713, 2002 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 7735 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2002).

Opinion

In an action to compel specific performance of a real estate contract, the plaintiffs appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Suffolk County (Hall, J.), dated February 1, 2001, which granted the defendant’s motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint.

Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs.

Contrary to the plaintiffs’ contention, the purported oral contract for the purchase of the subject real property is unenforceable (see General Obligations Law § 5-703 [1]; Ghura v Islip Resource Recovery Agency, 122 AD2d 106). Accordingly, the Supreme Court properly granted the defendant’s motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint.

The plaintiffs’ remaining contentions are either unpreserved for appellate review or without merit. O’Brien, J.P., Krausman, Schmidt and Cozier, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Ghura v. Islip Resource Recovery Agency
122 A.D.2d 106 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1986)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
296 A.D.2d 568, 745 N.Y.S.2d 713, 2002 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 7735, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/kandler-v-suffolk-county-division-of-real-estate-nyappdiv-2002.