Kamvan Co. v. Rammel

Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York

Kamvan Co. v. Rammel

132 Misc. 2d 909, 506 N.Y.S.2d 804, 1986 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 2801

CourtAppellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York

DecidedJuly 8, 1986

StatusPublished

Cited by3 cases

This text of 132 Misc. 2d 909 (Kamvan Co. v. Rammel) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Kamvan Co. v. Rammel, 132 Misc. 2d 909, 506 N.Y.S.2d 804, 1986 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 2801 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1986).

Pincite

Opinion

OPINION OF THE COURT

Per Curiam.

Order entered January 7, 1986 modified by denying tenants’ [910]*910motion for summary judgment and, as modified, order affirmed, with $10 costs to the appellant.

Summary judgment is not warranted in this nonprimary residence proceeding. Tenants assert that their overseas employment — which began in May 1983 — is of "temporary” duration and that they will resume living at the subject apartment upon termination of their current work assignment. While these allegations, when considered with other indicia of tenants’ residence at the premises, are sufficient to raise factual questions as to the situs of tenants’ primary residence, they do not finally resolve the issue. "The conflict as to where the primary residence really is should be resolved at trial.” (Coronet Props. Co. v Adelman, 112 AD2d 100.)

Hughes, P. J., Riccobono and Parness, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

OPINION OF THE COURT

Per Curiam.

Order entered January 7, 1986 modified by denying tenants’ [910]*910motion for summary judgment and, as modified, order affirmed, with $10 costs to the appellant.

Summary judgment is not warranted in this nonprimary residence proceeding. Tenants assert that their overseas employment — which began in May 1983 — is of "temporary” duration and that they will resume living at the subject apartment upon termination of their current work assignment. While these allegations, when considered with other indicia of tenants’ residence at the premises, are sufficient to raise factual questions as to the situs of tenants’ primary residence, they do not finally resolve the issue. "The conflict as to where the primary residence really is should be resolved at trial.” (Coronet Props. Co. v Adelman, 112 AD2d 100.)

Hughes, P. J., Riccobono and Parness, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

132 Misc. 2d 909, 506 N.Y.S.2d 804, 1986 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 2801, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/kamvan-co-v-rammel-nyappterm-1986.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack