Coronet Properties Co. v. Adelman

112 A.D.2d 100
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedJuly 18, 1985
StatusPublished
Cited by7 cases

This text of 112 A.D.2d 100 (Coronet Properties Co. v. Adelman) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Coronet Properties Co. v. Adelman, 112 A.D.2d 100 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1985).

Opinion

Order of the Supreme Court, New York County (Wright, J.), entered January 7, 1985, which granted defendants’ motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint and directed an assessment on defendant’s counterclaim for attorneys’ fees, reversed, on the law, without costs, and summary judgment and the assessment denied.

Plaintiff" landlord commenced this action for a declaratory judgment in August 1984 that apartment 3-A at 405 West 57th Street was exempt from rent stabilization protection by virtue of the fact that defendants tenants did not occupy it as their primary residence.

The defendants are a widow and her son. The lease for the apartment was originally held by the widow and her late husband, and when that lease expired, the widow obtained a lease in her own name running through October 31, 1983.

The court, at Special Term, granted summary judgment to the defendants and, pursuant to Real Property Law § 234, directed an assessment for counsel fees, inasmuch as the defendants had been successful in the action commenced by the landlord.

Summary judgment was not warranted in view of the issues of fact which should be addressed. It is conceded that the son does not reside at the apartment and is merely a frequent visitor. The widow, when she stayed with her daughter at 301 East 79th Street, allegedly for only four days in October 1981, after she had been robbed, registered to vote from the 79th Street address. Moreover, the voter registration card indicated a longer period of residence at 79th Street. While there are other indicia of residence at 57th Street, some of them came into being after the commencement of the action. The conflict as to where the primary residence really is should be resolved at trial. Concur — Kupferman, J. P., Sandler, Bloom, Kassal and Rosenberger, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

352-354 W. 48th St. Hous. Dev. Fund Corp. v. Tineo
2024 NY Slip Op 50286(U) (Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York, 2024)
Jemrock Realty Co., LLC v. Sternberg
2024 NY Slip Op 50148(U) (Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York, 2024)
47 HK Realty, LLC v. O'Leary
Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York, 2017
Ansonia Associates Ltd. Partnership v. Unwin
47 Misc. 3d 28 (Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York, 2014)
Extell Belnord LLC v. Uppman
113 A.D.3d 1 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2013)
Kamvan Co. v. Rammel
132 Misc. 2d 909 (Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York, 1986)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
112 A.D.2d 100, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/coronet-properties-co-v-adelman-nyappdiv-1985.