Kampf v. Dreyer
119 A.D. 134, 103 N.Y.S. 962, 1907 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3887
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided April 26, 1907·Published·Cited by 2 cases
Opinion
The defendants employed areal estate agent to: secure a. purchaser of their land-, and this is an action for his commission. He did not procure a purchaser. He brought to the defendants two persons. who obtained from them a-written agreement' to sell the land to such persons, but the latter signed no agreement, and afterwards refused to sign an agreement or take a deed.
The judgment should- be affirmed.
Present — Hírsohberg, P. J.,'Woodward, Jenks, Hooker and (xAYNOR, JJ. ' . ' ■ '
' Judgment unanimously affirmed, with costs.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Kampf v. Dreyer, 119 A.D. 134, 103 N.Y.S. 962, 1907 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3887 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1907).
119 A.D. 134 (Kampf v. Dreyer) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Wiesenberger v. Mayers
281 A.D. 171 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1952)
Kampf v. Dreyer
120 A.D. 897 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1907)