Home/Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York/Kamate v. Kamate

Kamate v. Kamate

260 A.D.2d 637, 687 N.Y.S.2d 274, 1999 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4267
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedApril 26, 1999
StatusPublished
Cited by5 cases

This text of 260 A.D.2d 637 (Kamate v. Kamate) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Kamate v. Kamate, 260 A.D.2d 637, 687 N.Y.S.2d 274, 1999 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4267 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1999).

Opinion

—In a child custody-proceeding pursuant to Family Court Act article 6, the petitioner appeals from an order of the Family Court, Kings County (Hepner, J.), dated January 21, 1998, which denied the petition.

Ordered that the order is affirmed, without costs or disbursements.

We have reviewed the record and agree with the appellant’s assigned counsel that there are no nonfrivolous issues which could be raised on appeal. Counsel’s application for leave to withdraw as counsel is granted (see, Anders v California, 386 US 738; People v Paige, 54 AD2d 631; cf., People v Gonzalez, 47 NY2d 606). O’Brien, J. P., Ritter, Joy and Altman, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

In re Baby Boy Z.J.
8 A.D.3d 493 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2004)
Myrick v. Saunders
5 A.D.3d 686 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2004)
Minervini v. Department of Social Services
284 A.D.2d 333 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2001)
In re Ishequasia Shaannaye G.
281 A.D.2d 545 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2001)
Boler v. Rice
280 A.D.2d 668 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2001)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
260 A.D.2d 637, 687 N.Y.S.2d 274, 1999 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4267, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/kamate-v-kamate-nyappdiv-1999.