Home/Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York/In re Baby Boy Z.J.

In re Baby Boy Z.J.

8 A.D.3d 493, 778 N.Y.S.2d 282
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedJune 14, 2004
StatusPublished

This text of 8 A.D.3d 493 (In re Baby Boy Z.J.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
In re Baby Boy Z.J., 8 A.D.3d 493, 778 N.Y.S.2d 282 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2004).

Opinion

[494]*494We have reviewed the record and agree with the appellant’s assigned counsel that there are no nonfrivolous issues which could be raised on appeal. Counsel’s application for leave to withdraw as counsel is granted (see Anders v California, 386 US 738 [1967]; Matter of Kamate v Kamate, 260 AD2d 637 [1999]). Smith, J.P., S. Miller, Crane and Rivera, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Anders v. California
386 U.S. 738 (Supreme Court, 1967)
Kamate v. Kamate
260 A.D.2d 637 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1999)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
8 A.D.3d 493, 778 N.Y.S.2d 282, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-baby-boy-zj-nyappdiv-2004.