Kaltenbach v. Benisch
This text of 252 A.D. 788 (Kaltenbach v. Benisch) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinions
[789]*789Order restraining, pendente lite, the unauthorized operation of a gasoline station affirmed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements. The granting of the restraining order was not an abuse of discretion. (Rice v. Van Vranken, 132 Misc. 82; affd., 225 App. Div. 179; affd., 255 N. Y. 541; Cohen v. Rosevale Realty Co., Inc., 120 Misc. 416; affd., 206 App. Div. 681.)
Carswell, Davis, Adel and Taylor, JJ., concur; Hagarty, J., dissents, with opinion.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
252 A.D. 788, 299 N.Y.S. 276, 1937 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 6301, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/kaltenbach-v-benisch-nyappdiv-1937.