Kaltenbach v. Benisch
252 A.D. 788, 299 N.Y.S. 276, 1937 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 6301
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided October 29, 1937·Published·Cited by 6 cases
Opinions
[789] Order restraining, pendente lite, the unauthorized operation of a gasoline station affirmed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements. The granting of the restraining order was not an abuse of discretion. (Rice v. Van Vranken, 132 Misc. 82; affd., 225 App. Div. 179; affd., 255 N. Y. 541; Cohen v. Rosevale Realty Co., Inc., 120 Misc. 416; affd., 206 App. Div. 681.)
Carswell, Davis, Adel and Taylor, JJ., concur; Hagarty, J., dissents, with opinion.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Kaltenbach v. Benisch, 252 A.D. 788, 299 N.Y.S. 276, 1937 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 6301 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1937).
252 A.D. 788 (Kaltenbach v. Benisch) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Lesron Junior, Inc. v. Feinberg
13 A.D.2d 90 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1961)
Daub v. Popkin
5 A.D.2d 283 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1958)
Mechtold v. Tilford
205 Misc. 1063 (New York Supreme Court, 1954)
Bazinsky v. Kesbec, Inc.
259 A.D. 467 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1940)
Bailer v. Ringe
255 A.D. 976 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1938)