Cohen v. Rosevale Realty Co.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Cohen v. Rosevale Realty Co.

206 A.D. 681

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedApril 15, 1923

StatusPublished

Cited by7 cases

This text of 206 A.D. 681 (Cohen v. Rosevale Realty Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Cohen v. Rosevale Realty Co., 206 A.D. 681 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1923).

Pincite

Opinion

Order affirmed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements. We are not disposed to interfere with the discretion, of the justice at Special Term, who granted the_ motion for a temporary injunction. The ease should [682]*682be tried, and the rights of the parties determined upon findings of fact and conclusions of law made after a trial. (Bergen Beach Land Corporation v. City of New York, 192 App. Div. 884.) Kelly, P. J., Manning, Kelby, Young and Kapper, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Order affirmed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements. We are not disposed to interfere with the discretion, of the justice at Special Term, who granted the_ motion for a temporary injunction. The ease should [682]*682be tried, and the rights of the parties determined upon findings of fact and conclusions of law made after a trial. (Bergen Beach Land Corporation v. City of New York, 192 App. Div. 884.) Kelly, P. J., Manning, Kelby, Young and Kapper, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

206 A.D. 681, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/cohen-v-rosevale-realty-co-nyappdiv-1923.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack