Cohen v. Rosevale Realty Co.
206 A.D. 681
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided April 15, 1923·Published·Cited by 7 cases
Opinion
Order affirmed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements. We are not disposed to interfere with the discretion, of the justice at Special Term, who granted the_ motion for a temporary injunction. The ease should [682]*682be tried, and the rights of the parties determined upon findings of fact and conclusions of law made after a trial. (Bergen Beach Land Corporation v. City of New York, 192 App. Div. 884.) Kelly, P. J., Manning, Kelby, Young and Kapper, JJ., concur.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cohen v. Rosevale Realty Co., 206 A.D. 681 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1923).
206 A.D. 681 (Cohen v. Rosevale Realty Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Gauthier v. Village of Larchmont
30 A.D.2d 303 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1968)
G. M. L. Land Corp. v. Foley
20 A.D.2d 645 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1964)
G. M. L. Land Corp. v. Foley
39 Misc. 2d 770 (New York Supreme Court, 1963)
People v. Margolies
166 Misc. 135 (New York County Courts, 1937)
Kaltenbach v. Benisch
252 A.D. 788 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1937)
Rice v. Van Vranken
225 A.D. 179 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1929)
Pritz v. Messer
148 N.E. 30 (Ohio Supreme Court, 1925)