Kalpin v. Director, Division of Taxation

6 N.J. Tax 258
New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division·Decided January 18, 1984·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Case below: 5 N.J.Tax 172.

The issue on this appeal is whether materials purchased by appellant which are used in his foundry operation, namely, sands, binders and washes, were exempt from taxation under the sales tax law by reason of the exemption provided in N.J.S.A. 54:32B-8.20. These materials do not become a component part of the finished product. Moreover, Tax Court Judge Andrew found from the evidence that the materials were not used “to induce or cause a refining or chemical process.” As a result, Judge Andrew concluded that the exemption did not apply, and we agree.

The judgment below is supported by substantial credible evidence and must be affirmed. R. 2.11-3(e)(1)(A) and (E); Rova Farms Resort, Inc. v. Investors Ins. Co., 65 N.J. 474, 483—484, 323 A.2d 495 (1974).

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Kalpin v. Director, Division of Taxation, 6 N.J. Tax 258 (N.J. Ct. App. 1984).

6 N.J. Tax 258 (Kalpin v. Director, Division of Taxation) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Phelps Dodge Industries, Inc. v. Director, Division of Taxation
8 N.J. Tax 354 (New Jersey Tax Court, 1986)