Kalmon Dolgin Co. v. Walnut Lanes Inc.

27 A.D.2d 843, 278 N.Y.S.2d 158, 1967 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4653
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedMarch 13, 1967
StatusPublished
Cited by7 cases

This text of 27 A.D.2d 843 (Kalmon Dolgin Co. v. Walnut Lanes Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Kalmon Dolgin Co. v. Walnut Lanes Inc., 27 A.D.2d 843, 278 N.Y.S.2d 158, 1967 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4653 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1967).

Opinion

Order of the Appellate Term, Second Judicial Department, dated April 8, 1966, reversed, on the law and the facts, and judgment of the District Court, Nassau County, entered September 23, 1965, awarding possession of leased premises to the landlord, etc., reinstated, with costs in this court and $25 costs and disbursements in the Appellate Term to the landlord. In our opinion, considering the lease as a whole, in the light of all its constituent parts, there is ambiguity or at least imperfectly expressed obligations regarding maintenance of the fire insurance protection for the demised premises. In such a ease, it is proper to admit parol evidence of the circumstances and negotiations prior to execution and also, if necessary, to look at the practical construction given the lease subsequent to execution (see Brooklyn Public Lib. v. City of New York, 250 N. Y. 495; Tobin v. Union News Co., 18 A D 2d 243, 245). The record indicates that the present tenant and its predecessor paid fire insurance premiums on the premises for seven years without objection. This construction of the lease from the outset, especially since it continued for so many years, is entitled to great weight because it was made “by the parties themselves when under the influence of conflicting interests” (Carthage Tissue Paper Mills v. Village of Carthage, 200 N. Y. 1, 14). It shows it was the intent of the parties to have the tenant pay all such premiums. Beldoek, P. J., Christ, Rabin, Benjamin and Munder, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Coliseum Towers Associates v. County of Nassau
2 A.D.3d 562 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2003)
Paroff v. Muss
171 A.D.2d 782 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1991)
Murphy v. Long Island Oyster Farms, Inc.
112 A.D.2d 276 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1985)
Bakas Restaurant, Inc. v. Charos
111 A.D.2d 360 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1985)
Countreyman v. Miller
96 A.D.2d 568 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1983)
67 Wall Street Co. v. Franklin National Bank
333 N.E.2d 184 (New York Court of Appeals, 1975)
United States v. Jacobs
304 F. Supp. 613 (S.D. New York, 1969)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
27 A.D.2d 843, 278 N.Y.S.2d 158, 1967 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4653, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/kalmon-dolgin-co-v-walnut-lanes-inc-nyappdiv-1967.