Countreyman v. Miller
This text of 96 A.D.2d 568 (Countreyman v. Miller) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
— In a negligence action to recover damages for personal injuries, defendants Nancy and Louis Miller appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Orange County (Gurahian, J.), dated July 6,1982, which [569]*569denied their motion for summary judgment dismissing the cross claim of defendant Bruyn. Order affirmed, without costs or disbursements. Ambiguities in the contract present triable issues of fact as to the intent of the parties. Therefore, summary judgment was properly denied (see Kalmon Dolgin Co. v Walnut Lanes, 27 AD2d 843). Mollen, P. J., Titone, Weinstein and Rubin, JJ., concur.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
96 A.D.2d 568, 464 N.Y.S.2d 1016, 1983 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 19102, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/countreyman-v-miller-nyappdiv-1983.