Kallman v. Wolf Corp.
This text of 25 A.D.2d 506 (Kallman v. Wolf Corp.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Order vacating the judgment herein entered July 9, 1964 unanimously affirmed, with $50 costs and disbursements to respondents. Tfie assessment [507]*507of punitive damages is an incident of damages which requires proof of a cause of action; punitive damage does not constitute a separate cause of action. (Gill v. Montgomery Ward é Co., 284 App. Div. 36, 41.) The vacatur of the California judgment removed the basis for the judgment herein because the complaint is grounded solely on the California judgment.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
25 A.D.2d 506, 266 N.Y.S.2d 779, 1966 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5050, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/kallman-v-wolf-corp-nyappdiv-1966.