Kalb v. Fisher
144 A. 919, 105 N.J.L. 491, 1929 N.J. LEXIS 250
Opinion
The judgment under review herein should be affirmed, for the reasons expressed in the opinion delivered by the Supreme Court.
For affirmance — THE CHANCELLOR, TRENCHARD, PARKER, KALISCH, KATZENBACH, CAMPBELL, WHITE, VAN BUSKIRK, McGLENNON, KAYS, HETFIELD, DEAR, JJ. 12.
For reversal — None. *Page 492
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Kalb v. Fisher, 144 A. 919, 105 N.J.L. 491, 1929 N.J. LEXIS 250 (N.J. 1929).
144 A. 919 (Kalb v. Fisher) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Wiard v. Market Operating Corporation
34 P.2d 875 (Washington Supreme Court, 1934)