Kakish v. Dominion of Canada General Insurance Company
731 N.W.2d 776, 478 Mich. 889
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Kakish v. Dominion of Canada General Insurance Company. Read the opinion of the Court — 476 Mich. 854 →
Opinion
Norma KAKISH and Rajaie Kakish, Plaintiffs-Appellants/ Cross-Appellees,
v.
DOMINION OF CANADA GENERAL INSURANCE COMPANY, Defendant-Appellee/ Cross-Appellant.
Supreme Court of Michigan.
On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the September 28, 2006 judgment of the Court of Appeals and the application for leave to appeal as cross-appellant are considered, and they are DENIED, because we are not persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court.
MICHAEL F. CAVANAGH, J., not participating due to a familial relationship with counsel of record.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Kakish v. Dominion of Canada General Insurance Company, 731 N.W.2d 776, 478 Mich. 889 (Mich. 2007).
731 N.W.2d 776 (Kakish v. Dominion of Canada General Insurance Company) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.