Kakish v. Dominion of Canada General Insurance Company
This text of 718 N.W.2d 357 (Kakish v. Dominion of Canada General Insurance Company) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Michigan Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Norma KAKISH and Rajaie Kakish, Plaintiffs-Appellants,
v.
DOMINION OF CANADA GENERAL INSURANCE COMPANY, Defendant-Appellee.
Supreme Court of Michigan.
On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the December 29, 2005 judgment of the Court of Appeals is considered and, pursuant to MCR 7.302(G)(1), in lieu of granting leave to appeal, we REMAND this case to the Court of Appeals for consideration of the issues whether the Ingham Circuit Court could exercise ancillary jurisdiction over plaintiffs' claim for uninsured/unidentified motorist benefits and whether the applicable insurance contract required plaintiffs to bring any lawsuit in an Ontario court.
MICHAEL F. CAVANAGH, J., not participating.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
718 N.W.2d 357, 476 Mich. 854, 2006 Mich. LEXIS 1564, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/kakish-v-dominion-of-canada-general-insurance-comp-mich-2006.