Kaiser v. Meinzer

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Kaiser v. Meinzer

402 A.2d 705, 265 Pa. Super. 595, 1979 Pa. Super. LEXIS 2153

CourtSuperior Court of Pennsylvania

DecidedApril 27, 1979

DocketNo. 1741

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 402 A.2d 705 (Kaiser v. Meinzer) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Superior Court of Pennsylvania primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Kaiser v. Meinzer, 402 A.2d 705, 265 Pa. Super. 595, 1979 Pa. Super. LEXIS 2153 (Pa. Ct. App. 1979).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

This appeal reaches us from an order of the court below entered May 15, 1978, striking a judgment entered in favor of appellant. Unfortunately, we do not have the benefit of an opinion as required by Pa.R.A.P. 1925(a) and because of the complex nature of the issue involved we feel compelled to require compliance. Accordingly, we remand for an opinion, to be filed within thirty (30) days of this order.

Without limiting the matters to be expressed in said opinion, we direct the attention of the court below to its Order of March 27, 1978 and that the record does not disclose the taking of any exceptions to said Order by either party. Since the judgment here involved is in seeming conformity to the Finding Of The Court entered on March 27, 1978, the opinion should explain the striking of the judgment at least in that particular.

[597]*597In addition to the remand for opinion it is directed that this appeal be consolidated for argument with the appeal presently in this Court at 1789 October Term, 1978.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM:

This appeal reaches us from an order of the court below entered May 15, 1978, striking a judgment entered in favor of appellant. Unfortunately, we do not have the benefit of an opinion as required by Pa.R.A.P. 1925(a) and because of the complex nature of the issue involved we feel compelled to require compliance. Accordingly, we remand for an opinion, to be filed within thirty (30) days of this order.

Without limiting the matters to be expressed in said opinion, we direct the attention of the court below to its Order of March 27, 1978 and that the record does not disclose the taking of any exceptions to said Order by either party. Since the judgment here involved is in seeming conformity to the Finding Of The Court entered on March 27, 1978, the opinion should explain the striking of the judgment at least in that particular.

[597]*597In addition to the remand for opinion it is directed that this appeal be consolidated for argument with the appeal presently in this Court at 1789 October Term, 1978.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

402 A.2d 705, 265 Pa. Super. 595, 1979 Pa. Super. LEXIS 2153, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/kaiser-v-meinzer-pasuperct-1979.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack