Kaiser-Reismann Corp. v. United States

U.S. Customs Court

Kaiser-Reismann Corp. v. United States

52 Cust. Ct. 248, 1964 Cust. Ct. LEXIS 3808

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Kaiser-Reismann Corp. v. United States. Read the opinion of the Court — 47 Cust. Ct. 363 →

United States Customs Court·Decided January 27, 1964·No. No. 68269; protests 58/5656 and 58/ 5929 (New York)·Published

Opinion

Opinion by

Ford, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the

merchandise consists of “Zehla Perlon Monofilaments,” composed of a non-cellulosic synthetic material the same in all material respects as the synthetic material the subject of United States v. Steinberg Bros. (47 CCPA 47, C.A.D. 727), and that the merchandise is similar in all material respects to that the subject of J. M. P. R. Trading Corp., Alltransport, Inc. v. United States (43 CCPA 1, C.A.D. 600), the claim of the plaintiff was sustained.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Opinion by

Ford, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the

merchandise consists of “Zehla Perlon Monofilaments,” composed of a non-cellulosic synthetic material the same in all material respects as the synthetic material the subject of United States v. Steinberg Bros. (47 CCPA 47, C.A.D. 727), and that the merchandise is similar in all material respects to that the subject of J. M. P. R. Trading Corp., Alltransport, Inc. v. United States (43 CCPA 1, C.A.D. 600), the claim of the plaintiff was sustained.

Kaiser-Reismann Corp. v. United States, 52 Cust. Ct. 248, 1964 Cust. Ct. LEXIS 3808 (cusc 1964).

Pincite

52 Cust. Ct. 248 (Kaiser-Reismann Corp. v. United States) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.