Kahn v. Kahn

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Kahn v. Kahn

256 A.D. 1000, 10 N.Y.S.2d 752, 1939 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5829

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided March 21, 1939·Published·Cited by 3 cases

Opinion

Order granting respondent’s motion to examine plaintiff and. defendant Samuel Kahn modified by adding the words “ with respect to the institution thereof ” after the word “ action ” in item I of the order appealed from, and as so modified the order in so far as it grants the examination before trial and in so far as it denies plaintiff’s motion to strike out the first and second separate defenses in the answer of Rose Tagger is affirmed, without costs. The validity of the defenses may not be determined at this time but must be decided by the trial court after the facts are developed on the trial. Examination to proceed on five days’ notice. Lazansky, P. J., Hagarty, Johnston, Adel and Taylor, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Order granting respondent’s motion to examine plaintiff and. defendant Samuel Kahn modified by adding the words “ with respect to the institution thereof ” after the word “ action ” in item I of the order appealed from, and as so modified the order in so far as it grants the examination before trial and in so far as it denies plaintiff’s motion to strike out the first and second separate defenses in the answer of Rose Tagger is affirmed, without costs. The validity of the defenses may not be determined at this time but must be decided by the trial court after the facts are developed on the trial. Examination to proceed on five days’ notice. Lazansky, P. J., Hagarty, Johnston, Adel and Taylor, JJ., concur.

Kahn v. Kahn, 256 A.D. 1000, 10 N.Y.S.2d 752, 1939 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5829 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1939).

Pincite

256 A.D. 1000 (Kahn v. Kahn) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related