Kahn v. Kahn

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Kahn v. Kahn

256 A.D. 1000, 10 N.Y.S.2d 752, 1939 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5829

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedMarch 21, 1939

StatusPublished

Cited by3 cases

This text of 256 A.D. 1000 (Kahn v. Kahn) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Kahn v. Kahn, 256 A.D. 1000, 10 N.Y.S.2d 752, 1939 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5829 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1939).

Pincite

Opinion

Order granting respondent’s motion to examine plaintiff and. defendant Samuel Kahn modified by adding the words “ with respect to the institution thereof ” after the word “ action ” in item I of the order appealed from, and as so modified the order in so far as it grants the examination before trial and in so far as it denies plaintiff’s motion to strike out the first and second separate defenses in the answer of Rose Tagger is affirmed, without costs. The validity of the defenses may not be determined at this time but must be decided by the trial court after the facts are developed on the trial. Examination to proceed on five days’ notice. Lazansky, P. J., Hagarty, Johnston, Adel and Taylor, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Order granting respondent’s motion to examine plaintiff and. defendant Samuel Kahn modified by adding the words “ with respect to the institution thereof ” after the word “ action ” in item I of the order appealed from, and as so modified the order in so far as it grants the examination before trial and in so far as it denies plaintiff’s motion to strike out the first and second separate defenses in the answer of Rose Tagger is affirmed, without costs. The validity of the defenses may not be determined at this time but must be decided by the trial court after the facts are developed on the trial. Examination to proceed on five days’ notice. Lazansky, P. J., Hagarty, Johnston, Adel and Taylor, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

256 A.D. 1000, 10 N.Y.S.2d 752, 1939 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5829, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/kahn-v-kahn-nyappdiv-1939.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack