Kade v. Sanitary Fireproofing & Contracting Co.

177 N.E. 421, 257 N.Y. 203, 1931 N.Y. LEXIS 840
New York Court of Appeals·Decided July 15, 1931·Published·Cited by 3 cases

Opinion

Per Curiam.

The personal representatives of the deceased partner are not necessary parties to this action brought by one who claims to be a surviving partner to compel an accounting by a third person in possession of the partnership assets.

The order of the Appellate Division granting a new trial is not subject to review upon this appeal from the- *206 final judgment (Kade v. Sanitary F. & C. Co., 256 N. Y. 371).

The judgment dismissing the complaint for defect of parties should be reversed without costs.

The appeal from the order granting a new trial should be dismissed.

Cardozo, Ch. J., Pound, Crane, Lehman, Kellogg, O’Brien and Hubbs, JJ., concur.

Judgment accordingly.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Kade v. Sanitary Fireproofing & Contracting Co., 177 N.E. 421, 257 N.Y. 203, 1931 N.Y. LEXIS 840 (N.Y. 1931).

177 N.E. 421 (Kade v. Sanitary Fireproofing & Contracting Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Claim of Daus v. Gunderman & Sons, Inc.
28 N.E.2d 914 (New York Court of Appeals, 1940)
Gallotti v. Continental Insurance
152 Misc. 351 (New York Supreme Court, 1933)
In re the Estate of Prince
141 Misc. 600 (New York Surrogate's Court, 1931)