Kaczynski v. Anderson
This text of 274 Mich. App. 801 (Kaczynski v. Anderson) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Michigan Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
The Court orders that a special panel shall be convened pursuant to MCR 7.215(J) to resolve the conflict between this case and Apsey v Mem Hosp (On Reconsideration), 266 Mich App 666; 702 NW2d 870 (2005).
The Court further orders that parts C and D of the opinion in this case, which address the out-of-state notary requirements for an affidavit of merit in a medical malpractice claim, are vacated. MCR 7.215(J)(5).
Appellant may file a supplemental brief within 21 days of the Clerk’s certification of this order. Appellee may file a supplemental brief within 21 days of the service of appellant’s brief. Nine copies must be filed with the Clerk of the Court.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
274 Mich. App. 801, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/kaczynski-v-anderson-michctapp-2007.