Kaadt v. Kaadt

223 P. 934, 110 Or. 573, 1924 Ore. LEXIS 220
CourtOregon Supreme Court
DecidedMarch 18, 1924
StatusPublished
Cited by4 cases

This text of 223 P. 934 (Kaadt v. Kaadt) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Oregon Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Kaadt v. Kaadt, 223 P. 934, 110 Or. 573, 1924 Ore. LEXIS 220 (Or. 1924).

Opinion

McBRIDE, C. J.

We have carefully considered the testimony and are satisfied therefrom that the allegations of the complaint are substantially sustained and that the court was fully justified in its findings in favor of plaintiff. There are no questions of law arising that have not been decided over and over again by this court, and to spread upon the records the facts shown upon the trial would simply encumber the reports and be of no interest to anyone.

[574]*574A careful reading and rereading of the testimony satisfies us that, while the defendant is a good woman morally, she possesses such peculiarities of temperament that it would be impossible for anybody to live with her in peace, and that her conduct in this respect and general attitude towards her husband has been such as to humiliate him, injure his health and prospects as a physician, and unjustly to degrade him in the community to the extent that it constitutes cruel and inhuman treatment within the meaning of the law.

The decree of the Circuit Court is therefore affirmed. Affirmed.

Bean, Brown and McCourt, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Scanlon v. Scanlon
154 So. 2d 899 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1963)
Scanlon v. Scanlon
20 Fla. Supp. 70 (Duval County Circuit Court, 1962)
Billion v. Billion
263 P. 397 (Oregon Supreme Court, 1928)
Costello v. Costello
251 P. 303 (Oregon Supreme Court, 1926)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
223 P. 934, 110 Or. 573, 1924 Ore. LEXIS 220, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/kaadt-v-kaadt-or-1924.