Kaadt v. Kaadt

223 P. 934, 110 Or. 573, 1924 Ore. LEXIS 220
Oregon Supreme Court·Decided March 18, 1924·Published·Cited by 4 cases

Opinion

McBRIDE, C. J.

We have carefully considered the testimony and are satisfied therefrom that the allegations of the complaint are substantially sustained and that the court was fully justified in its findings in favor of plaintiff. There are no questions of law arising that have not been decided over and over again by this court, and to spread upon the records the facts shown upon the trial would simply encumber the reports and be of no interest to anyone.

[574] A careful reading and rereading of the testimony satisfies us that, while the defendant is a good woman morally, she possesses such peculiarities of temperament that it would be impossible for anybody to live with her in peace, and that her conduct in this respect and general attitude towards her husband has been such as to humiliate him, injure his health and prospects as a physician, and unjustly to degrade him in the community to the extent that it constitutes cruel and inhuman treatment within the meaning of the law.

The decree of the Circuit Court is therefore affirmed. Affirmed.

Bean, Brown and McCourt, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Kaadt v. Kaadt, 223 P. 934, 110 Or. 573, 1924 Ore. LEXIS 220 (Or. 1924).

223 P. 934 (Kaadt v. Kaadt) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Scanlon v. Scanlon
154 So. 2d 899 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1963)
Scanlon v. Scanlon
20 Fla. Supp. 70 (Duval County Circuit Court, 1962)
Billion v. Billion
263 P. 397 (Oregon Supreme Court, 1928)
Costello v. Costello
251 P. 303 (Oregon Supreme Court, 1926)