Juvenile Officer v. R.D.M.

Missouri Court of Appeals

Juvenile Officer v. R.D.M.

169 S.W.3d 178, 2005 Mo. App. LEXIS 1212

CourtMissouri Court of Appeals

DecidedAugust 16, 2005

DocketNos. WD 64947, WD 64948, WD 64949

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 169 S.W.3d 178 (Juvenile Officer v. R.D.M.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Missouri Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Juvenile Officer v. R.D.M., 169 S.W.3d 178, 2005 Mo. App. LEXIS 1212 (Mo. Ct. App. 2005).

Pincite

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

R.D.M. (Father) appeals from the judgments terminating parental rights to his sons, R.J.M. and D.J.M. Upon review of the record, we find the judgment is supported by evidence of Father’s abuse and neglect, and that the termination was in the best interest of the children. The judgment is affirmed.

[179]*179We have provided the parties with a Memorandum explaining the reasons for our decision, because a published opinion would have no precedential value. Rule 84.16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

R.D.M. (Father) appeals from the judgments terminating parental rights to his sons, R.J.M. and D.J.M. Upon review of the record, we find the judgment is supported by evidence of Father’s abuse and neglect, and that the termination was in the best interest of the children. The judgment is affirmed.

[179]*179We have provided the parties with a Memorandum explaining the reasons for our decision, because a published opinion would have no precedential value. Rule 84.16(b).

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

169 S.W.3d 178, 2005 Mo. App. LEXIS 1212, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/juvenile-officer-v-rdm-moctapp-2005.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack