In the Interest of Rjm
This text of 169 S.W.3d 178 (In the Interest of Rjm) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Missouri Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
In the Interest of R.J.M, B.M.M., D.J.M., Plaintiff.
Juvenile Officer, Respondent,
v.
R.D.M. (Father), Appellant,
R.H. (Mother), Defendant.
Missouri Court of Appeals, Western District.
Frederick P. Tucker, Macon, MO, for appellant.
James D. McConnell, Shelbyville, MO, for respondent.
Susan R. Barrow, Macon, MO, for R.J.M., B.M.M., and D.J.M. and Guardian.
Jill R. Creed, Macon, MO, for defendant.
Before: HARDWICK, P.J., BRECKENRIDGE and SPINDEN, JJ.
ORDER
PER CURIAM.
R.D.M. (Father) appeals from the judgments terminating parental rights to his sons, R.J.M. and D.J.M. Upon review of the record, we find the judgment is supported by evidence of Father's abuse and neglect, and that the termination was in the best interest of the children. The judgment is affirmed.
*179 We have provided the parties with a Memorandum explaining the reasons for our decision, because a published opinion would have no precedential value. Rule 84.16(b).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
169 S.W.3d 178, 2005 WL 1949956, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-the-interest-of-rjm-moctapp-2005.