Justin Gerald Fredrichsen v. the State of Texas

Court of Appeals of Texas·Decided January 25, 2022·No. 14-21-00579-CR·Published

Opinion

Dismissed and Memorandum Opinion filed January 25, 2022.

In The

Fourteenth Court of Appeals

NO. 14-21-00579-CR

JUSTIN GERALD FREDRICHSEN, Appellant V. THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

On Appeal from the 240th District Court Fort Bend County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. 13-DCR-063375

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Appellant was convicted of deadly conduct. See Tex. Penal Code Ann. § 22.05(b). Subsequently, the trial court granted appellant’s motion for new trial.

Generally, we only have jurisdiction to consider an appeal by a criminal defendant when there has been a final judgment of conviction. See Workman v. State, 343 S.W.2d 446, 447 (Tex. Crim. App. 1961); McKown v. State, 915 S.W.2d 160, 161 (Tex. App. – Fort Worth 1996, no pet.). Because appellant has been granted a new trial, there is no final conviction to appeal. Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal for want of jurisdiction.

PER CURIAM

Panel consists of Wise, Spain, and Hassan. Do Not Publish — Tex. R. App. P. 47.2(b)

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Justin Gerald Fredrichsen v. the State of Texas, (Tex. Ct. App. 2022).

Justin Gerald Fredrichsen v. the State of Texas (Justin Gerald Fredrichsen v. the State of Texas) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Workman v. State
343 S.W.2d 446 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1961)
McKown v. State
915 S.W.2d 160 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 1996)