Julius Spiro & Co. v. Bibb

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Julius Spiro & Co. v. Bibb

1911 OK 33, 117 P. 199, 27 Okla. 780, 1911 Okla. LEXIS 52

CourtSupreme Court of Oklahoma

DecidedJanuary 10, 1911

Docket1775

StatusPublished

Cited by3 cases

This text of 1911 OK 33 (Julius Spiro & Co. v. Bibb) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Oklahoma primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Julius Spiro & Co. v. Bibb, 1911 OK 33, 117 P. 199, 27 Okla. 780, 1911 Okla. LEXIS 52 (Okla. 1911).

Pincite

Opinion

WILLIAMS, J.

A transcript of the proceedings of the lower court was filed in this court on June 16, 1910. No brief has been made and served by plaintiffs in error, as required by rule 7. On September 17, 1910, defendant in error moved to dismiss said appeal for failure to comply with said rule. Neither has any response been made to said motion, nor any application for leave to file typewritten briefs.

The motion to dismiss is sustained.

All the Justices concur, except HAYES, J., absent and not participating.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

WILLIAMS, J.

A transcript of the proceedings of the lower court was filed in this court on June 16, 1910. No brief has been made and served by plaintiffs in error, as required by rule 7. On September 17, 1910, defendant in error moved to dismiss said appeal for failure to comply with said rule. Neither has any response been made to said motion, nor any application for leave to file typewritten briefs.

The motion to dismiss is sustained.

All the Justices concur, except HAYES, J., absent and not participating.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

1911 OK 33, 117 P. 199, 27 Okla. 780, 1911 Okla. LEXIS 52, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/julius-spiro-co-v-bibb-okla-1911.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack