Julius Spiro & Co. v. Bibb
1911 OK 33, 117 P. 199, 27 Okla. 780, 1911 Okla. LEXIS 52
Opinion
A transcript of the proceedings of the lower court was filed in this court on June 16, 1910. No brief has been made and served by plaintiffs in error, as required by rule 7. On September 17, 1910, defendant in error moved to dismiss said appeal for failure to comply with said rule. Neither has any response been made to said motion, nor any application for leave to file typewritten briefs.
The motion to dismiss is sustained.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Julius Spiro & Co. v. Bibb, 1911 OK 33, 117 P. 199, 27 Okla. 780, 1911 Okla. LEXIS 52 (Okla. 1911).
1911 OK 33 (Julius Spiro & Co. v. Bibb) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Cox v. Warford
1912 OK 540 (Supreme Court of Oklahoma, 1912)
Chicago, R. I. & P. Ry. Co. v. Toney
1912 OK 122 (Supreme Court of Oklahoma, 1912)
A., T. & S. F. Ry. Co. v. McFarland
1912 OK 2 (Supreme Court of Oklahoma, 1912)