Chicago, R. I. & P. Ry. Co. v. Toney

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Chicago, R. I. & P. Ry. Co. v. Toney

1912 OK 122, 121 P. 642, 32 Okla. 193, 1912 Okla. LEXIS 240

Supreme Court of Oklahoma·Decided February 6, 1912·No. 1563·Published

Opinion

Opinion by

AMES, C.

This is an appeal from an order of the district court sustaining a motion to dismiss an appeal taken to that court from a court of a justice of the peace, in December, 1908. Since this appeal was taken, the question has been settled by the decisions of this court, and counsel for the plaintiff in error now concede that the case should be affirmed. Atchison, T. & S. F. Ry. Co. v. McFarland, 30 Okla. 594, 120 Pac. 559; Graham Paper Co. v. Bartlesville Pub. Co., 27 Okla. 781, 117 Pac. 199; Farmers' Mill & Elevator Company v. Lewis, 29 Okla. 245, 110 Pac. 764; Holcomb v. Chicago, R. I. & P. Ry. Co., 27 Okla. 667, 112 Pac. 1023.

By the Court: It is so ordered.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Opinion by

AMES, C.

This is an appeal from an order of the district court sustaining a motion to dismiss an appeal taken to that court from a court of a justice of the peace, in December, 1908. Since this appeal was taken, the question has been settled by the decisions of this court, and counsel for the plaintiff in error now concede that the case should be affirmed. Atchison, T. & S. F. Ry. Co. v. McFarland, 30 Okla. 594, 120 Pac. 559; Graham Paper Co. v. Bartlesville Pub. Co., 27 Okla. 781, 117 Pac. 199; Farmers' Mill & Elevator Company v. Lewis, 29 Okla. 245, 110 Pac. 764; Holcomb v. Chicago, R. I. & P. Ry. Co., 27 Okla. 667, 112 Pac. 1023.

By the Court: It is so ordered.

Chicago, R. I. & P. Ry. Co. v. Toney, 1912 OK 122, 121 P. 642, 32 Okla. 193, 1912 Okla. LEXIS 240 (Okla. 1912).

Pincite

1912 OK 122 (Chicago, R. I. & P. Ry. Co. v. Toney) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related