Julio Alvarado v. State

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Julio Alvarado v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 562 S.W.3d 450
Court of Appeals of Texas·Decided June 10, 2014·No. 01-13-00894-CR·Published

Opinion

COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIRST DISTRICT OF TEXAS AT HOUSTON

MEMORANDUM ORDER

Appellate case name: Julio Alvarado v. The State of Texas

Appellate case numbers: 01-13-00894-CR; 01-13-00895-CR

Trial court case number: 1325689; 1325690

Trial court: 232nd District Court of Harris County

Appellant’s court-appointed counsel filed a brief concluding that the above-referenced appeals are frivolous. See Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 744, 87 S. Ct. 1396, 1400 (1967). Counsel has not, however, filed a motion to withdraw from representation. If appointed counsel believes that an appeal is frivolous, counsel must request permission to withdraw. See id. An Anders brief must accompany a motion to withdraw; neither the brief nor the motion may be filed on its own. See id.; In re Schulman, 252 S.W.3d 403, 406–08 (Tex. Crim. App. 2008). Accordingly, we order appellant’s appointed counsel to file with the Clerk of this Court within 10 days of the date of this order a motion to withdraw that complies with Texas Rules of Appellate Procedure 6.5 and 9. See TEX. R. APP. P. 6.5, 9; Schulman, 252 S.W.3d at 410, 412. It is so ORDERED.

Judge’s signature: /s/ Michael Massengale  Acting individually  Acting for the Court

Date: June 10, 2014

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Julio Alvarado v. State, (Tex. Ct. App. 2014).

Julio Alvarado v. State (Julio Alvarado v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Anders v. California
386 U.S. 738 (Supreme Court, 1967)
In Re Schulman
252 S.W.3d 403 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 2008)