Julio Alvarado v. State

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Julio Alvarado v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 562 S.W.3d 450
Court of Appeals of Texas·Decided July 24, 2014·No. 01-13-00894-CR·Published

Opinion

COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIRST DISTRICT OF TEXAS AT HOUSTON

ORDER

Appellate case name: Julio Alvarado V. The State of Texas

Appellate case numbers: 01-13-00894-CR & 01-13-00895-CR

Trial court case numbers: 1325689 & 1325690

Trial court: 232nd District Court of Harris County

Appellant’s appointed counsel, J. Sidney Crowley, has filed a motion to withdraw and the accompanying brief required by Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S. Ct. 1396 (1967). Purporting to act as appellant’s counsel, attorney Cory Roth has filed “Julio Alvarado’s Response to His Appointed Counsel’s Anders Brief.” Thus, there are two attorneys who have made appearances in this matter claiming to represent appellant. The court orders Roth to either file a motion to substitute as counsel, see TEX. R. APP. P. 6, or present this court with authority permitting a retained attorney to file a response to an Anders brief.

Judge’s signature: /s/ Michael Massengale_______________________ Acting individually

Date: July 24, 2014___________________________

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Julio Alvarado v. State, (Tex. Ct. App. 2014).

Julio Alvarado v. State (Julio Alvarado v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Anders v. California
386 U.S. 738 (Supreme Court, 1967)