Julian v. United States Department of Agriculture

585 F. App'x 850
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided November 24, 2014·No. Nos. 14-1480, 14-1925·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Christopher B. Julian and Renee G. Julian appeal the district court’s orders denying relief on their civil complaint against the United States Department of Agriculture, seven federal employees, and one state employee. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Julian v. U.S. Dep’t of Agric., No. 4:13-cv-00054-JLK-RSB (WD.Va. Mar. 24, 2014; Aug. 15, 2014). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before [851] this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Julian v. United States Department of Agriculture, 585 F. App'x 850 (4th Cir. 2014).

585 F. App'x 850 (Julian v. United States Department of Agriculture) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Julian v. United States
658 F. App'x 1014 (Federal Circuit, 2016)
Julian v. United States
Federal Claims, 2016