Julian v. United States Department of Agriculture
This text of 585 F. App'x 850 (Julian v. United States Department of Agriculture) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
Christopher B. Julian and Renee G. Julian appeal the district court’s orders denying relief on their civil complaint against the United States Department of Agriculture, seven federal employees, and one state employee. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Julian v. U.S. Dep’t of Agric., No. 4:13-cv-00054-JLK-RSB (WD.Va. Mar. 24, 2014; Aug. 15, 2014). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before [851]*851this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
585 F. App'x 850, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/julian-v-united-states-department-of-agriculture-ca4-2014.