JULIA RIBAUDO SENIOR SERVICES v. Department of Public Welfare

946 A.2d 638
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania·Decided April 3, 2008·No. 144 WAL 2007·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

AMENDED ORDER

PER CURIAM.

AND NOW, this 3rd day of April 2008, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is GRANTED. The issue, rephrased for clarity, is:

Whether the Commonwealth Court erred in concluding that an administrative agency’s notice that clearly advises the recipient of the effective date of the agency’s action, but that does not specifically designate a “date of mailing,” is insufficient to begin the appeal period? If the notice is sufficient, is the recipient entitled to an appeal nunc pro tunc?

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

JULIA RIBAUDO SENIOR SERVICES v. Department of Public Welfare, 946 A.2d 638 (Pa. 2008).

946 A.2d 638 (JULIA RIBAUDO SENIOR SERVICES v. Department of Public Welfare) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Julia Ribaudo Senior Services v. Department of Public Welfare
969 A.2d 1184 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 2009)
Burger v. BLAIR MEDICAL ASSOCIATES, INC.
946 A.2d 638 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 2008)